Category: privacy

Online Ad Lobby Raising $1 Million to Help Fight Against Privacy Safeguards

The Interactive Ad Bureau [Google, CBS, Comcast, NBC, Facebook, Fox, Microsoft, BlogHer and many others] is fundraising to “undertake additional coordinated advocacy at the Federal and state level. IAB is nearly half-way to our goal of raising $1 million in cash…”  Funds will be used to support a campaign that includes “our ongoing advocacy efforts to combat legislation and regulation that could damage the interactive advertising industry.”  IAB calls this its “Consumer Protection and Education Campaign,” because it also includes a goal of a billion online ads (to be donated by marketers) used to “support consumer and business understanding and appreciation of the interactive advertising industry.”

We are sure that there will be many–such as the growing interest of the news media in the issue—that will follow this special interest money–especially as the Congress and FTC focus on protecting consumers online.

Microsoft’s Global Social Media Marketing Strategy–A glimpse into how it plans to boost its brand, generate more advertising, and tell`branded’ stories

Last March, Microsoft hired a “Microsoft Emerging Media Manager.”  Here’s an excerpt from the job description:

“research, coordinate, project manage and implement emerging media marketing initiatives as across major global brands including Windows, Bing, Office, Windows Phones, and across our commercial business audiences. The ideal person will be immersed in what it means to “live life online” through channels such as Hulu, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc. across the three screens of PC, television, and mobile phones… drive the evolution of Microsoft’s engagement with consumers around new and developing experiences including social media and mobile, will leverage and connect paid and earned media activities, and drive business impact in a results-driven manner to increase adoption and scale…be fluent in online campaign engagement…”

and from its current Social Media Manager opening; note the role of story-telling.–“Collaborating with social media BG owners to build a connected social strategy that incorporates BG social properties and brings to life Microsoft’s consumer innovation story.
• Working with the social media agency to build, launch and manage Microsoft branded social platforms
• Member of the One Microsoft v-team building an editorial calendar to tell the One Microsoft story across social channels.
• Become the internal and external voice for Microsoft social media consumer story, participating in best practice sharing and creative idea generation.  This role requires a passion for digital media and intense curiosity about the future of how consumers interact with each other, consume and engage with content, and develop affinity to brands online.“

U.S. Consumers Targeted with 1 Trillion Display Ads in 2010, First Quarter

That’s right–a Trillion.  Think about all the data collected.  Facebook itself delivered 176 billion display ad “impressions,” explains comScore.  Yahoo and Microsoft sent 132 billion and 60 billion ads, respectively.  Leading online advertisers that quarter were AT&T, Verizon, Scottrade, Experian and others–so think about privacy, network neutrality, online financial marketing and consumer protection all together.  These issues are all connected.

Online Ad Industry Exec Warns of Dangers from “Targetocracy”/Urges IAB to Take Privacy Issue Seriously

We’re glad other online industry leaders see that addressing consumer privacy issues is required–instead of the denials coming from the IAB online ad lobbying group.  Doug Weaver, CEO for the UpStream Group writes in response to the IAB’s op-ed in USA Today, for example that:

“I think a sustainable privacy strategy begins with acknowledgment of the problem that exists.   Facts is facts: the “Targetocracy” in our business is big, wildly overcapitalized and a little bit out of control.  What I think consumers want to hear from Randy and the IAB is “we take the issues raised by the Journal very seriously.  The issues and the technology are quite complicated, but we remain committed to rooting out the bad guys and maintaining an environment that’s rich, free and privacy focused.”

As one of the IAB’s earliest board members and one who’s contributed a great deal of time and effort toward its mission over the years, I believe it’s time for the group to act less like the Chamber of Commerce and more like the Internal Affairs Department.  There are both rogues and careless polluters in our industry and their actions poison the environment for everyone.   Not everyone wants regulation, but the consumer wants to know someone’s in charge.  Who’s that going to be?

Google’s interest in better bandwidth access for video and interactive ads—do negotiations with Verizon reflect recent changes for YouTube?

Google recently made an announcement that will require likely greater bandwidth for Google’s YouTube.  According to its July 9, 2010 post, “Today at the VidCon 2010 conference, we announced support for videos shot in 4K, meaning that now we support original video resolution from 360p all the way up to 4K…We’re excited about this latest step in the evolution of online video.” Also perhaps relevant to its Verizon dealmaking is Google’s move towards long-form ad supported videos on YouTube, to better position itself as a commercial video provider. If they want to ensure they are first in the `que’ with other entertainment companies, then reversing its position on network neutrality is part of their business plans.  They are ultimately in the same show biz/advertising space as everyone else is.   Btw, given that the media/telecom companies really don’t see a difference when marketing and distributing across multiple platforms, inc, mobile, it’s outrageous mobile would be exempt from network neutrality rules.  But perhaps blame it on Google’s Admob acquisition and its [and everyone else’s] plans for mobile location ad targeting!

Here’s an excerpt from today’s Ad Age article on Google’s new higher resolution and more bandwidth system for YouTube:  “YouTube recently announced support for “4k video,” meaning video files with a dimensional size up to 4096 x 2304 pixels — in other words, much larger than your computer can handle.  Online video is booming, and marketers are still trying to figure out how to create the optimal user experience and achieve the best results for their campaigns…YouTube mentions that watching videos in 4k requires an “ultra-fast high-speed broadband connection,” but this is actually the least-important requirement. While users on slower broadband connections can always wait for enough of the video to download and buffer before watching it (though why would a marketer force consumers to do that?)…

Tracking Consumers to Identify their “Intent” to Purchase Products and Services. Safeguards Required for Predictive Behavioral Targeting

As the FTC and Congress work to create new safeguards, they must address a range of issues related to new forms of data collection, profiling and tracking.  As the WSJ series illustrates [which used information provided by my CDD], privacy is at risk in today’s digital marketing system.  The growth of so-called “predictive” behavioral targeting is one example of marketers pushing the data collection technology envelope without considering the consequences to consumers and citizens.

Yesterday, for example, display ad company Dapper released a new ad product designed to improve display marketing that incorporates “user intent determination” with the “real-time” online ad auction process that sells access to individual consumers to the highest bidder.  In its release, Dapper explains that it can:  “Infer users intent: Through IntentMatch, Dapper DisplayDR goes far beyond retargeting to harvest and combine behavioral (via the advertiser’s own data or 3rd party data), semantic, contextual, geographic, and performance signals to match each product and offer to user intent and inform the bidding process. This multi-dimensional approach improves accuracy and performance, and significantly expands the reach of display efforts beyond behavioral targeting alone…Serve dynamic display ads that match products to intent and are optimized for performance: With Dapper DisplayDR, advertisers can show each consumer the most relevant offers from the Product Search Engine matched to their intent…Receive insightful analytics on a product level: Each campaign is tracked for clicks, conversions, and interaction down to the most granular level of specific products and offers.”

All of this is combined with the online ad exchange system that sells us to advertisers as if we are cattle at an auction: “Advertisers using Dapper DisplayDR can buy media at the impression level in real-time and algorithmically through the ad exchanges. Dapper DisplayDR features the first real-time bidding engine optimized for dynamic advertising, bidding the right price for every impression based on the probability and value of conversion – at scale – as determined by individual purchase intent, product preference, price, time to purchase, geolocation, and more. As advertisements run, Dapper DisplayDR integrates business rules and performance cues to price each bid efficiently. Dapper also leverages performance lifts to bid higher for the most profitable audiences…”

Google tells investors via SEC: New privacy laws could be “inconsistent with our data practices” And the “hundreds” of engineers they have working on display ad technology

Google’s 10Q second quarter report just filed at the SEC has an interesting reflection on how the online ad giant views the privacy issue.  It wrote that:

Regulatory authorities around the world are considering a number of legislative proposals concerning data protection. In addition, the interpretation and application of data protection laws in Europe and elsewhere are still uncertain and in flux. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, this could result in an order requiring that we change our data practices, which could have an adverse effect on our business. Complying with these various laws could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business.

And a somewhat related angle–Google’s focus on generating more ad dollars online.   Brandweek reports, in an article on all the venture investment going into expanding online targeting that:

Neal Mohan, the vp of product management at Google who leads its display ad efforts, believes the display ad market could be five times the size it is today, if the system for buying ads was more efficient and the performance measurement was better.

“It can be done, frankly, a lot better than it is today,” Mohan said, noting Google now has “hundreds” of engineers working on display advertising technology.

 

WSJ Begins Online Ad/Privacy Series. Plus Online Marketers Explain Behavioral Targeting, including role of social media for predicting people’s behavior “before they do it”

The Wall Street Journal launched an important new series on the online marketing and data collection/targeting industry.  Julian Angwin and colleagues have the the first main piece entitled “The Web’s New Gold Mine: Your Secrets.”  The subhead underscores what we have been telling policymakers and others for the last several years:  “…one of the fastest-growing businesses on the Internet is the business spying on consumers.” The theme of the series: “Marketers are spying on Internet users – observing and remembering people’s clicks, and building and selling detailed dossiers of their activities and interests.”

They have done a terrific job, including producing a innovative video on how cookies work, including its history online. There are special graphics as well illustrating the data tracking process.  They also discuss the growth of so-called predictive behavioral targeting, including the use of social media.  The OpenAmplify CEO explains “Social media is an amazing opportunity. For the first time in marketing history we have hundreds of millions of people online telling us what they like, what they hate and what they’re going to do before they do it … That’s extremely valuable data.”

Meanwhile, online marketers are preparing to place the forthcoming behavioral ad “icon” from the online ad industry– that’s supposed to help the industry politically head off consumer protection rules.  Here’s how one legal expert working with online marketers, in discussing the icon, describes behavioral targeting:

“Behavioral ads use technology that tracks a user’s surfing behavior on the Internet. Key data includes clickstream data such as searches made, content read, site-visit times, and websites visited. With this key data about a specific user, advertisers can create a behavioral pattern that can be linked to a specific online demographic, which becomes the basis for ads that target the specific demographic…For example, a frequent traveler can be tracked to different locations through geographically different IP addresses, and then by combining this information with cookie data, an advertiser can draw a clear picture of the person’s travel habits – destinations, length of stay, travel frequency, preferred airlines – plus much more.”

I doubt the forthcoming digital data collection and targeting “icon” and its accompanying information will stand the truth test!  How do you explain an entire “ecosystem” of data collection and profiling techniques, including social media marketing, neuromarketing, “immersive” video, online ad exchanges, etc. with a tiny digital [and appropriately named] ‘bug.”

Multi-Billion $ Stakes for Online Consumers in How Congress Protects Their Privacy and Transactions

It’s time for policymakers to act and protect online consumers–who are at risk confronting a largely invisible, sophisticated, and far-reaching digital marketing system.  It’s useful to see how much was spent targeting U.S. consumers online.  This is from the IAB’s 2009 online advertising revenue report [my bold]:
Retail Advertisers Continue to Drive Consumer Ad Spending –2009 Annual Results
 Retail advertisers continue to represent the largest category of Internet ad spending, accounting for 20 percent of revenues for the full year of 2009 or $4.5 billion, down from the 22 percent ($5.0 billion) reported in 2008.
 Telecom companies accounted for 16 percent of 2009 full year revenues or $3.6 billion, up slightly from the 15 percent ($3.5 billion) reported in 2008
 Leisure Travel (airfare, hotels & resorts) accounted for 6% percent of 2009 revenues ($1.5 billion) compared to the 6 percent or $1.4 billion reported in 2008.
 Financial Services advertisers accounted for 12 percent of 2009 full year revenues or $2.8 billion, down from the 13percent ($3.0 billion) reported in 2008.
 Automotive advertisers accounted for 11 percent of 2009 full year revenues or $2.5 billion, down slightly from the 12 percent ($2.8billion) reported in 2008.
 Computing advertisers represented the fifth-largest category of spending at 10 percent of 2009 full year revenues or $2.3 billion, in line with the 10 percent reported ($2.4 billion) in 2008.
 Consumer Packaged Goods and Food Products represented 6 percent of the full year 2009 revenues ($1.4 billion), in line with the 6 percent or $1.5 billion reported in 2008.
 Entertainment accounted for 4% of 2009 full year revenues ($1.0 billion), up slightly from the 4% ($917million) reported in 2008.
 Media accounted for 4 percent of 2009 full year revenues or $881 million, up slightly from the 3 percent ($764 million) reported in 2008.

[and to underscore its importance, note the definition of financial services online marketing used by the IAB:  Financial Services—includes commercial banks, credit agencies, personal credit institutions, consumer finance companies, loan companies, business credit institutions and credit card agencies. Also includes companies engaged in the underwriting, purchase, sale or brokerage of securities and other financial contracts. 

As well as the $1.5 billion spent last year on:  Lead Generation—fees advertisers pay to Internet advertising companies that refer qualified purchase inquiries (e.g., auto dealers which pay a fee in exchange for receiving a qualified purchase inquiry online) or provide consumer information (demographic, contact, behavioral) where the consumer opts into being contacted by a marketer (email, postal, telephone, fax). These processes are priced on a performance basis (e.g., cost-per-action, -lead or -inquiry), and can include user applications (e.g., for a credit card), surveys, contests (e.g., sweepstakes) or registrations. 

Online Advertising and News: How HuffPost Worked with GE

An excerpt from Ad Age’s interview [June 30, 2010] with Greg Coleman, Pres. of Huffington Post.  Coleman described the online news site as a “social media company,” able to “help our marketers beam their messages throughout the internet, across the galaxy, the internet, and the world.”  One of their advertisers is GE.:

Ad Age: Can you give me an example of Huffington Post’s view on social advertising?

Mr. Coleman: One example is a terrific project we did with General Electric, where GE has this whole campaign on “healthymagination.” We allowed them to run advertising on anything tagged “wellness” across our site — they were looking for positive health information. We then created a special share bar for GE, and any time you tweeted that article or retweeted that article or shared it, the ad module would go with it. So when you shared it with your friends on Facebook, the GE ad module would go there. When you retweeted it, [you’d get] the hashtag “GE healthymagination.” … We’re trying to come up with the real metrics, but we believe that the reach of the campaign is far greater off of our site, as a result of the social tools on our site.