Month: September 2010

Mobile Marketer Delivers “Real World Behavioral Targeting”–they know where you are and what you do!

Mobile marketers have embraced the behavioral tracking, profiling and targeting paradigm–but they now add real location.  Brightkite, which offers “highly targeted mobile media, says it delivers “Ultra-Targeted Advertising,” including:

Real World Behavioral targeting

Want to target people who have purchased items in a hardware store? Or people who go to the movies more than twice a month? Or people that buy coffee more than three times a week? We know who they are, and can put your campaign in front of an audience who cares.

Examples:

For Pantene, we targeted people in hair salons.
For Dentyne, we targeted people in social groups of two or more…

Location and Place targeting

We can target by precise geography – such as, people in Tulsa, people within 2 miles of a KFC, people at Costco, people in a bar, etc.

Examples:

For Chevrolet, we targeted people within 3 miles of a dealership on a given weekend.
For Jack in the Box, we targeted people within 2 miles of a restaurant in the week following the launch of smoothies in each restaurant…

Activity

Want to target people who are currently doing something specific? We know what our members are doing throughout the day, so we can get a relevant ad to match their current activity.

Example:

For Grey Goose Vodka, we targeted people over 21 engaged in drinking and nightlife activities…

Weather

We know the location of our millions of users, and we also know the precise weather in each location. This allows us to target or optimize ads according to the local weather. We can deliver ads only when the temperature is over certain threshold, or deliver different creatives if the weather is sunny, cloudy, raining, snowing.

Example:

Diet Coke wanted to target people when the afternoon temperature was over 75°.
Big-O tires wanted to target to days with ice or heavy rain.

Facebook Promotes its “Virtual” Currency–and its data tracking–via Cancer Charity

When big advertising and media companies want to introduce a new or expanded form of marketing, they generally found some non-profit cause.  Who can complain about the techniques used–say for mobile ads, data collection, online games–when the funds are earmarked for a worthy charity?  It’s a time honored tactic, done by the Ad Council, initiatives such as Pepsi Refresh and now Facebook.  AllFacebook reports that “Stand Up to Cancer” is asking supporters to donate using “Facebook Credits.”  It explains that:

Facebook has been making great progress in its goal of making Credits the main or exclusive virtual currency on the site, with Zynga the latest social game company to agree to an exclusive deal. Facebook makes a 30% cut when users spend Credits on virtual goods in social games such as Farmville or Mob Wars… Facebook does gain in other ways from the collaboration, besides feeling good about helping cancer research. The fundraising event will help promote Facebook Credits as a payment system, both on the site through user activity and potentially also through the hour-long celebrity fundraising telethon on ABC, CBS, Fox, NBC and some cable channels …

On the Facebook “Stand Up to Cancer” page, one can learn that “Facebook Credits are the safe and easy way to make payments on Facebook. You can buy Facebook Credits using PayPal, your credit card, or mobile phone. Please keep in mind if your donation includes Facebook Credits that you received for free, the value of your donation will be reduced by those free credits. Also, your donation may not be tax deductible, so please consult a tax professional. For this event, Facebook is waiving its processing fees and 100% of your donations go to Stand Up To Cancer.”

Facebook has ambitious plans for its Credit initiative: it “wants Credits to be the universal currency in social games on its platform.”  The social network is using Credits with a Target stores partnership.  Earlier this month, Facebook took “a step closer to establishing Credits as the exclusive payment system for virtual goods on the social networking site, wrapping up a deal with the biggest social game company, Zynga…Facebook gets a 30% cut from the game developer for all transactions via Credits.” Virtual goods, as its called, is already a major business–estimated with $1 billion sales this year.

But there are questions around Facebook Credits and other virtual currencies–on privacy, consumer protection rules, and digital marketing.  Charities and others should be more cautious when endorsing such schemes.  The FTC, EU and other regulators need to place digital currencies on a real–not virtual–policy radar.

Google’s new `simplifed’ Privacy Policy: More disclosure and honesty required [updated]

Last week Google announced it was “simplifying and updating” its privacy policies.  As it so often does, the announcement was framed as a `we did for your good’ kind of effort.  “[W]e want to make our policies more transparent and understandable,” it explained, noting that “most privacy policies are still too hard to understand.” But as so often with Google and other online marketers, you have to both read between the digital lines and also analyze what’s really going on.

Google’s revised policy, which takes effect October 3, fails to really explain to consumers/users what’s actually going on.  Like other privacy policies, Google claims that all its data collection is to “provide you with a better experience and to improve the quality of our services.”  But what they really mean–and what the Congress, the FTC and other regulators must require them to disclose–is that they have crafted a wide-ranging system designed to foster personalized data collection and online targeting.  Missing from the revised Privacy Policy (which Google, btw, is pitching to privacy advocates and no doubt others as a  paragon of digital virtue) is any candid disclosure on how its Doubleclick, Admob, Google Display Network, Ad Exchange, Teracent, and other services collect information from and about us.

Google isn’t alone–Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo and everyone else rely on a purposefully deceptive privacy policy to engage in data collection activities that require disclosure and individual user control.  Google is also reshaping its privacy policy to better capture all the data it can collect across multiple platforms and applications. Here, just for the record, is what Google advertised in Ad Age’s recent Ad Exchange and online advertising guide [excerpt]:  No matter how you define performance, the Google Display Network offers a solution. By bringing more measurability and precision to your advertising, it enables you to create, target and optimize ads based on real-time data, meaning better returns for you.

The Google Display Network helps advertisers and agencies achieve performance at scale by delivering relevant, accountable ads to their target audiences—in more places, more often…Precisely target your audience: The Google Display Network’s technology enables you to find customers based on their interests, sites they visit and when they’re engaging with relevant content via contextual targeting, or show specific messages to users who’ve already visited your site with remarketing…The Google Display Network provides opportunities to advertise in all such environments—feeds, games, mobile, social networks and video streams— enabling you to create an immersive experience for your audience.

PS.  Well, Google just also announced what its interactive display ad system can do for marketers.  How come this isn’t in the privacy policy in understandable language and full consumer control? Excerpt:  Advertising with Google used to be all about four lines of text, on Google.com and on our partner sites. No longer. Did you know that, outside of ads alongside search results, more than 40 percent of the ads that we show are now non-text ads? And that doesn’t include the 45 billion ads that our DoubleClick advertising products serve every day across the web.

We get excited by display advertising for a number of reasons…Teracent’s technology can automatically tailor and select the creative elements in an ad, and adjust them based on location, language, weather and even the past performance of ads, to show the optimal ad.  We’re focused on helping advertisers get the best results from their campaigns—by enabling creative branding campaigns, precise targeting, wide reach and effective measurement. Over recent years, we’ve added a ton of new features to YouTube and the Google Display Network, to help advertisers get—and measure—the results they’re after. From remarketing to Campaign Insights to video targeting on YouTube, we’re building tools that are helping advertisers get great results and enabling them to run some of the most amazing ad campaigns the world has ever seen.

Microsoft Fuels Youth Obesity Epidemic via Xbox tie-ins: Digital Product Placement and Beyond

Microsoft is one of the most aggressive online marketing companies targeting teens online.  Across the globe, Microsoft Advertising touts its ability to deliver interactive food and beverage ads on PCs, mobile phones, gaming devices and via IM, Bing, etc.  Teens and young adults are the key target–but so are young children.  In its desperation to catch up with online ad leader Google, Microsoft has strained to be the “yes we will” digital agency.  For several years, Microsoft has had a close tie with Pepsi’s Doritos and Mountain Dew, offering various special games that feature the chip.  Now Microsoft is continuing that alliance, as the new Halo:Reach edition comes to market.  As explained by Variety, “helping build Microsoft’s brand is Madison Avenue, which has fully embraced the franchise’s main character, Master Chief, and turned him into a pitch soldier, with PepsiCo plastering him on 300 million Mountain Dew cans and 30 million bags of Doritos for the launch of the latest game.”

Microsoft officials–and those who play a influential role in the company–should not endorse digital marketing schemes that target youth–and especially contribute to such major public health problems as youth obesity.  For shame, Microsoft.

Google’s non-neutral YouTube–Gives Advertisers “Brand Protection” to bypass online videos

Google, like other major advertising and media companies, works hard to please its biggest advertisers.  For decades, radio and TV networks relied on Standards and Practices divisions to screen programs to make sure they were suitable “environment” for commercials.  So-called “brand protection” has mushroomed online–as we predicted it would many years ago.  The business model for TV and the Internet are aligned–it must please the Fortune 1000 advertiser first.  So it’s no surprise that Google has launched a “brand protection feature” for YouTube, explains Ad Age, that provides “more control for advertisers to exclude objectionable videos, genres, channels.”  Ad Age explained that YouTube’s new feature, is called “target excludes.” It’s “part of the site’s Video Targeting Tool, which gives advertisers the choice to exclude as few as one video they don’t want their product associated with as well as specific genres and channels. The feature addresses the most often-criticized aspect of YouTube: You can buy video there, but you never know what you’ll get.Other uses for this new feature by advertisers include improving returns by excluding channels or videos that are not relevant to the brand or those that are performing poorly.”

Here’s how Google explains it: “We’re constantly working to give advertisers control and flexibility over their YouTube campaigns. We place great value on this because ads are an extension of what a company represents as a business, and we want YouTube to be a place where that reputation and image can flourish. To that end, we’ve been rolling out features to keep advertisers in control of their campaigns…Google has also been investing significantly in ensuring brand safety, transparency and control for advertisers across the Google Display Network. We’re hoping that these added layers of control will make your campaign targeting even more precise.”

As we said, so-called online brand protection is a booming business.  But its purpose, explains one online advertiser, is to be “a preemptive technology and is designed to block ads from appearing next to controversial content…protecting brands from potentially damaging negative associations resulting out of negative content adjacencies.”  But questions should be raised now about how decisions will be made placing videos and other content on so-called censoring “whitelists” [which are really blacklists]. How will it ultimately affect the diversity of controversial content online?  Does YouTube further go from a quasi common carrier to an environment where, as we already see, Google favors some content over others?   Will the online medium be further transformed to reflect the TV model, with consequences to serious journalism and independent content?  The questions are larger than what Google does.  But given Google’s network neutrality flipflop and its online ad and data collection ambitions, a debate about the impact of so-called “brand protection” on the future of the online media is in order.

Future of Privacy Forum: Funded by Facebook and other online data companies [Need to disclose when discussing social networks and privacy department]

In an August report, the Future of Privacy Forum told its supports that [our bold]: “We welcome Bering Media as a new sponsor of FPF… Thanks to our existing sponsors for their on-going  support: Adobe, AOL, AT&T, The Better Advertising Project, BlueKai,  Deloitte, eBay, Facebook, Intel, Lockheed Martin, Microsoft, The  Nielsen Company, Qualcomm, TRUSTe, Verizon and Yahoo.”

When the Forum was launched, we feared that its role was to serve as a kind of quasi-research organization that sanctioned the online data collection status quo. So far it has failed (like most in the online ad industry), in our opinion, to provide an accurate analysis of the online data collection landscape–which would, of course, alienate its corporate backers.  But whenever the Forum speaks to the press (as it recently did on Facebook Places) or policymakers–it must first identify these financial connections.

PS:  Forum co-founder and corporate attorney Chris Wolf identifies how his group isn’t really focused on privacy from a public interest and democracy perspective.  In his Hogan Lovells law firm blog he writes that the Future of Privacy Forum is “focused on advancing consumer privacy in ways that are business practical.”   Business Practical!   That means created by lobbyists for their special interests.

Kmart targets teens online, via Alloy Media Digital Marketing: Time for FTC & Congress to Protect Adolescent Consumers, inc. Privacy

Teens are ground zero for the digital marketing industry, worldwide, since they are seen as the “always-on” online generation.  Companies such as Microsoft, AOL, Sulake, MTV/Nick and many others closely research the digital behaviors of youth–all so they can be better targeted online.  This week, Kmart became the lead sponsor for a new online series featuring “product integration” and produced by tween/teen targeting company Alloy Media [now owned by Zelnick Media].  Here’s what Ad Age reported [excerpt]:This week, Alloy debuts “First Day,” its first wholly original series for the web and a branded-entertainment vehicle for Kmart, which will use the program to promote three of its back-to-school product lines: Bongo, Rebecca Bon Bon and Dream Out Loud…Josh Bank, Alloy Entertainment’s East Coast president, saw “First Day” as a creative challenge to build a series’ concept around Kmart’s brand brief. The eight-episode series follows main character Cassie…as she’s forced to relive her first day of high school over again, “Groundhog Day” style…Although Kmart and its products are never addressed by name in “First Day,” each episode will be supported by display and video pre-roll video ads highlighting the participating retail lines, with links to Kmart’s own micro-sites to purchase the products seen in the series. “First Day” will also receive heavy promotion via click-to-expand video ad units from Alloy properties such as Gurl.com, Alloy.com and Teen.com, and exclusive web partnerships with Meez.com, Candystand and Fanpop among others. Kmart’s media agency, MPG, and digital agency, Digitas, helped broker the deal and create the media plan with Alloy.”

Here’s how Alloy Digital explains what it delivers for marketers:  “Nobody knows the youth market better. As a pioneer in the digital space, Alloy connects with millions of young consumers online through highly trafficked websites and premium original web programming. What does that mean for you? Access to the highest concentration of teens, tweens and young adults available online. And comScore agrees – the Alloy Digital Network has ranked #1 in its category for the past year…At Alloy, our sole mission is to identify and develop innovative spaces and tactics to ensure your brand message reaches an engaged audience.”  They explain to advertisers that they know their youth target well: “We know who they are. Socialites, gamers, skaters, fashionistas – we’re all about what they’re into, where they hang out, who they are “socializing” with and … we know where to reach them. Our networks are unparalleled. No other company can deliver this level of specificity, on this large a scale and with this degree of focus. We are where they are, and so is your message.”

And it’s time to wake up FTC and state a-g’s–let alone parents.  Look at how Alloy tries to capture its youthful target via these interactive marketing tactics:
Display: Standard IAB units, interstitials

  • Full rich media capabilities
  • Targeting by geographic and demographic

Video pre/mid/post-roll

  • Targeting by geographic and demographic

Custom Integrated Programs:

  • Homepage Domination
  • Custom Video Programs
  • Sweepstakes & Contests
  • Advertorials, Quizzes, Editorial Sponsorships, Polls
  • Custom Games
  • Virtual World brand immersion programs
  • Social Media integration within Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube

and in searching for partners to help them target youth, Alloy explains:
“As a select member of the Alloy Digital Network, you can increase your ad revenue, raise your site visibility, traffic and buzz among users…

Become a Partner Member – Does your site have what it takes to be a part of the network? Established audience? Ad-friendly? The requirements are:

  • Minimum 100k monthly unique visitors
  • Content targeting 12-34 demo…”

Teens should not be the focus of non-transparent and unfair online marketing tactics, including data collection.  This is part of the current federal privacy and fair rules for online marketing, especially for youth, debate.  Stay Tuned!